| If this email is not displayed properly or the links do not work, click here | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Welcome to the second edition of the f40 Group’s e-newsletter F40 represents those authorities that are the poorest funded - those at the bottom of the funding league table. We are a group that campaigns for fairer funding of education. We are seeking fairer funding without detrimental impact on other authorities. For nearly a decade this group, in one form or another, has been actively arguing for improvements to the existing funding formula and although at times it has felt as though we have been banging our collective heads against the wall, we currently believe we are well-positioned to influence real change |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
There have already been some successes. For example, we believe that we helped persuade the government to introduce greater transparency and simplicity to the system in 2004 and we also played a crucial part in the government’s decision to deal with pockets of deprivation, which resulted in significant new funding for many authorities. We have been successful because we are widely drawn from across the country – shires, metropolitans and unitaries – and have adopted a professional approach, with dedicated individuals fighting for justice. And our future success also depends on working together and singing from the same hymn sheet and that is why more poorly funded local authorities are being encouraged to join this campaign group. The ongoing DSG Funding Review is our best chance of achieving what we collectively want. The group is determined to gain funding equity and it is essential that we influence the review by providing indisputable evidence and strong, well-considered arguments to support our case. This is a crucial time for f40 authorities and for those authorities that also suffer the injustice of unfair funding. Together I believe we can achieve real and significant change in this review which will ensure that the children in our schools get the levels of funding they deserve. David Kidney, MP for Stafford and Chair of the f40 Group of Local Authorities |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full details about the work of the DSG funding review group can be accessed on the Teachernet website. The f40 Group has submitted evidence papers in respect of Activity-led funding and Area Cost Adjustment, both of which can be viewed on our website – www.f40.org.uk The Group is also planning to submit an evidenced-based response in respect of Special Educational Needs but will await the outcome of national research commissioned by the government. The DSG funding review group has identified that a substantial amount of major research is required to determine real and accurate positions in respect of many elements of the funding review. The government, through the DCSF has already commissioned much of this work from external consultants and some is well advanced. The key areas of research so far to support the review are, not surprisingly :
The DCSF has indicated that the results of all the research undertaken will be available on the DSF Review pages of the TeacherNet website. |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Backwards to a Formula – f40 consultant Lindsey Wharmby offers a view on the funding formula review As the DCSF is reviewing the formula for allocating resources to local authorities for their schools budgets, then it’s a safe assumption that they intend to return to a formula distribution. The basic formula was introduced in 2003 but suspended when the Dedicated Schools Grant (DSG) was introduced in 2006. The DSG is a 100% ring-fenced grant for use as the schools budget: local authorities can add to it from their own resources but must use it all in the schools budget. The current allocation is based on the local authority’s spend on its schools budget in 2005-06, increased for inflation each year and with some additional funds allocated through ministerial priorities – a system known as Spend Plus. Many local authorities, including many in the f40 Group, asked for this because local authorities that spent above the original formula from their own resources were disadvantaged when local authority funding was realigned to allow for the ring-fenced DSG. The loss for these authorities although real, was not as large as some had feared. It remains a problem and one that has to be tackled in any return to a formula through some kind of transition arrangement. Authorities were still in the transitional stages of the original 2003 formula when it was abandoned, but now we need to get back to a formula as soon as possible because:
No formula is perfect, but the best ones have clear principles, use up-to-date information and are constantly reviewed. The introduction of a new formula requires sensitive transitional arrangements to enable schools (and local authorities) to cope with change. If it is believed that the new formula is a fairer method of distribution, not to implement it because of any turbulence it causes would be is intrinsically unfair. It’s far better to deal with the turbulence. Losers always shout louder than winners, but that does not mean that change is bad – just noisy. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Here's an outline of what the DSG formula review group will be examining at its future programmed meetings. 27 October 2008 – Academies funding 24 November 2008 – to be advised 26 January 2009 – Review of work on Activity-led funding 23 February 2009 – Streamlining of Grants and a review of work on Additional Educational Needs 23 March 2009 – Review of work on Area Cost Adjustment Then, over the following six months, the Review Group will further develop the emerging proposals for a new formula and submit an initial report to Ministers. Consultation proposals will be developed at the back end of 2009, leading to the launch of a comprehensive consultation programme from January to March 2010. During the period April to June the proposals will be further developed taking into account responses received. Broad decisions on the new look DSG formula will be announced in July 2010 and applied to the scholl funding settlement for 2011-12. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At the last f40 Executive Committee meeting (13 September 2008) there was a comprehensive discussion about the work of the DSG funding review group’s work so far and what further actions f40 should be taking to ensure its voice is heard. The minutes of the meeting, which are available on f40’s website, record the main points Executive Committee members considered. David Kidney concluded the discussion by emphasising that by the end of 2008 it is critically important that f40 has a clear line on each key topic within the review. This will allow the Group to further influence the emerging outcomes before initial results are passed to Ministers. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
It was agreed that f40 will concentrate its efforts on three priority areas:
The committee agreed that this will provide necessary focus for f40 over the next few months. Further details of our approach and actions will be circulated in due course. The next f40 Executive Committee meeting will be held at 11am on Saturday 29 November 2008 at Amerton Farm, Stowe by Chartley, near Stafford. The Executive Committee is an open meeting that representatives of any f40 authority may attend. If you are interested in getting involved, please contact the Group’s secretary – see contact details at the end of this e-news. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In recognition of the importance of ensuring that MPs representing f40 areas across the country are fully aware of the DSG funding review, its implications and how the f40 Group is trying to influence outcomes, David Kidney has agreed to host a briefing session in the House of Commons later this year. He will also hold similar briefings for the LGA and trade unions involved in education.
|
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
F40’s annual conference in 2009 may well prove to be the most important event the group has ever organised, coming as it does, at a crucial time in the DSG review process. So far we know that this important event will be held in Wakefield, and we thank Peter Glover, chair of Wakefield Schools Forum and Elaine McHale, Corporate Director for Family Services, for agreeing to be our hosts. We’re looking at a date in March or April, which is when the DSG Review Group’s will be looking at key elements of the formula and weighing up the evidence presented by research consultants and other contributors, like f40. It’s also the time when initial proposals for change will be drafted in readiness for Ministerial consideration. |
![]() Pictured: Wakefield Cathedral |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Our chairman, David Kidney, has recently written to the Secretary of State, Ed Balls, to invite him to be our main speaker at this conference and we have invited him to suggest a date that best suits him. As soon as we hear back, we’ll confirm the date to everyone and place details on f40’s website. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
During this critically important period, when the whole DSG formula is under review, we have a rare opportunity to influence change that might benefit the poorest-funded authorities and create an education grant system that offers fair funding for all. There’s strength in numbers and that’s why f40’s Executive Committee is inviting more authorities to join its campaign. F40 chair, David Kidney MP said: I would like to encourage more authorities at the lower end of the funding league table to join f40. “We have a record 27 authorities in membership of the f40 Group, but we would like to see more join our ranks. “Since our last e-news in May, Devon County Council and North Lincolnshire Council have joined, though for budgetary reasons, North Somerset unfortunately has had to withdraw from membership. “Our campaign for funding improvement would undoubtedly have greater strength and achieve success much more quickly if more authorities were to show their support. I invite them to get in touch to consider how together we can make thie most of this once in a generation opportunity to achieve change to the funding regime.” The current members of f40 are: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The following 13 authorities, by ranking, make up the "poorest forty" in the government's funding league table of 150 LEAs:
Wiltshire CC (146) But even those just outside the ‘worst forty’ rankings might wish to consider membership of f40. Being in the bottom third of the funding league means children and schools in these areas are getting a raw deal compared to other authorities higher up the table which get much healthier settlements. These include: Hampshire CC (119) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Please see our website at www.f40.org.uk
F40’s secretarial, membership and PR services are provided by Doug Allan at DTW. He can be contacted on 01287 610404 or by email at doug@dtw.co.uk
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||