The case for fair funding for schools has been made, and accepted by the government.  F40’s Finance Managers Research Team (FMRT) has undertaken extensive work on a new, fairer funding formula, and has discussed proposals and modelling with the Education Funding Group at Department for Education.

Polaroids2The proposal from the f40 group, which represents many of the lowest-funded education authorities, initially made the case for a national funding framework for schools, to be introduced from 2017/18, but the government has now delayed the implementation to 2018-19.

f40 proposes a new model for distributing education funding in England which retains the existing Dedicated Schools Grant (DSG) structure with three blocks: Schools, Early Years and High Needs. The model allocates the funding available through a needs-based formula for each block, removing any reliance on historic spending patterns.

The government provided an additional £390m in 2015/16 under the Fairer Schools Funding banner in acknowledgement of the unfairness of the current arrangements. They made it clear that the extra funding was a first step, a down-payment, towards a new national funding arrangement. (Further information can be located in the Archive section. See Fairer Funding – background).

f40 pointed out that, in its opinion, the methodology chosen by the DfE for allocation of the extra cash between local authorities was flawed, in particular by being based solely on the Schools Block of the DSG. Regretfully the government was not prepared to reconsider its calculations.

On the plus side, f40 argued that the extra funding should be baselined into schools budgeting beyond 2015-16 and this was confirmed by the government.

f40’s modelling for a new formula is based on the following principles/features:

  • We want a formula for distributing the national schools budget to local authorities based on a clear rationale: from 2017/18 education funding can be geared towards improving educational standards across the country rather than perpetuating an inequitable distribution of the national budget.
  • The main building block is core entitlement at pupil level. The formula enables a school to have access to similar resource levels for a child’s basic classroom costs i.e. the share of a teacher and teaching assistant.  The core entitlement reflects different needs and costs at the various Key Stages.
  • The formula contains factors to reflect pupil level needs beyond the core entitlement (e.g. deprivation and high incidence SEN) and factors to reflect the needs of small schools that are necessary in a local authority’s structure. The DfE will need to provide clarity about what needs and outcomes each factor is seeking to address.

In considering the national funding formula, f40 concluded that it favoured a proposal which resulted in a core formula to produce a local authority level total, with each local authority then having discretion on how the total is allocated to schools within the area.  As every local authority has a different school structure and different methods of dealing with funding allocations, it is important that there should be adequate local flexibility and discretion, in discussion with the local Schools’ Forum, to move funding between Schools, High Needs and Early Years blocks.

We wish to see a new formula-based approach phased in over a three year period. We appreciate the need for year-on-year changes to be manageable for individual schools. Should the government wish to continue some form of MFG for schools, there’ll be a need for greater flexibility to manage the position where budget allocations through MFG are clearly excessive for some schools. We must also avoid a lengthy transition period which then perpetuates unfair funding.

The Narrative, which outlines the basic thinking, can be viewed here.